2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 399.02

+0.1%

Dec 19 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: bart13 who wrote (120923)	7/18/2016 2:03:53 AM
From: Maurice Winn	Read Replies (1) of 218649

<Hell, I can even envision massively extreme acts (like a suitcase nuke going off in NY and/or other major cities) that may have me lean towards wasting entire terrorist families etc., assuming the existence of reliable proof that ISIS or similar was the source.> When push comes to shove and it's do or die, the finer points of etiquette are ignored. The atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were persuasive. They certainly saved a LOT of American lives and probably Japanese too [by stopping the war]. If each time there was an Allah Akbar mass murder attack there was a tactical nuclear explosion at the most concentrated remaining Moslem sites, it would not be many decades before the "Allah Akbar" was muted. Especially if Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Kuwait, Libya and Iran became UN condominiums and the oil cash flow funded UN operations instead of Jihadism. They wouldn't want to get the wrong ones [Sunni/Shite]. That would be like bombing Rome because Henry 8th attacked somebody. He'd do it again to encourage more bombing of Roman sites. Mqurice

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next