SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Mevis who wrote (604544)8/3/2016 8:00:01 AM
From: bruwin2 Recommendations

Recommended By
alanrs
Neeka

  Read Replies (1) of 793921
 
IMO, Trump and his team shouldn't waste any of their time confirming the unfit status of that has-been, Obama. It's more than likely going to offend the intelligence of the millions who are already aware of that obvious and proven fact.

Trump and his team must now "roll up their sleeves" and target that woman who is REALLY UNFIT to be considered "Presidential material".

They must start putting in front of the country's collective eyeballs and into their collective ear canals, what that woman and her husband have done in order to build up their personal fortunes at the expense of the American taxpayers ... and that is apart from her illegal email excursions and the disastrous and wholly unnecessary deaths of diplomats in Benghazi on her watch.

There were, apart from anything else, several occasions when she was Secretary of State, that she eased the way for her husband to carry out his underhand dealings under the guise of their so-called "altruistic(?)" Clinton Foundation ..... not to mention the money they made for themselves and their lackeys in their Haitian ventures ....

Trump and his team must start flinging mud at this woman and dare her to deny their accusations, which they can back up with a lot of research done by competent others ....

Then we'll start to see who can really be defined as fit or unfit, and who, of their sycophantic "celebrities(?)", will still want to be firmly associated with that woman and her philandering husband ....
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News