SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Paul Senior who wrote (57698)8/6/2016 8:03:43 AM
From: Graham Osborn  Read Replies (1) of 78673
 
Hi Paul, I agree with everything you said. My general take is the number that comes out of any valuation analysis is far less important than the assumptions which went in - which is my reason for building every model from scratch based on the situation. When I am contemplating a long position I try to be bearish on every assumption so as to establish a wide margin of safety. For short positions (FWIW) I do the opposite, making the most optimistic of assumptions. As you noted, I was pretty bearish on the growth assumptions, particularly on a constant-currency basis for ROW revenues. And in most investment banking circles I would be taken out and shot for terminating the cash flows at 2050 - just my personal negative bias that conditions can change quickly in tech. Changing those assumptions could easily double the calculated price at a given discount rate, and the market may well think that way.

Having completed the model, I don't really know it adds much to the valuation argument beyond a simple EV/ FCF comparison. Still, I think it's interesting to observe how the market might treat an equity-bond as real rates head lower or higher.

I'll still be taking a full position, although like you I am waiting for a bit of retracement.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext