The Crooked Hillary Vox Media fraud continues!! Vox Media is a name branding company that is paid to write favorable stories about their clients. Vox Media was founded by penny stock fraudster Jerome Armstrong.who wrote favorable stories about dubious penny stocks and not disclosing he was paid to do so.
Armstrong appears to have moved forward with the penny stock touting idea founding Vox Media spreading daily stories about Crooked Hillary without disclosing that they are paid to do so. Here is Vox Media latest BIG PILE OF CRAP. Vox Media was funded by hedge funds such as Accel Partner that was involved and made a fortune in the Uranium company featured in the Clinton Cash movie americans4innovation.blogspot.com that are supporting crooked Hillary. NBC Universal has also kicked in 200 million dollars en.wikipedia.org
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RuPaul just gave the most politically pragmatic endorsement of Hillary Clinton
Updated by German Lopez @germanrlopez german.lopez@vox.com Aug 12, 2016, 5:08p
vox.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
U.S. SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSIONLitigation Release No. 20228 / August 7, 2007SEC v. Sierra Brokerage Services, Inc., et al., United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio. Civil Action No. C2-03-326 On July 26, 2007, the Honorable John D. Holschuh, U. S. District Judge for the Southern District of Ohio, entered a Final Judgment as to defendant Jerome B. Armstrong ("Armstrong"). The Final Judgment permanently enjoins Armstrong from future violations of Section 17(b) of the Securities of 1933. The Final Judgment further orders Armstrong to pay disgorgement in the amount of $5,832, prejudgment interest of $3,235, and a civil penalty of $20,000. Armstrong consented to the entry of the Final Judgment without admitting or denying the allegations of the Commission's Complaint, except as to jurisdiction.
The Commission's Complaint, filed on April 14, 2003, alleged that beginning on March 6, 2000, Armstrong touted the stock of BluePoint Linux Software Corporation ("BluePoint") by posting unsubstantiated, favorable buy recommendations on the Raging Bull internet site. Armstrong posted over eighty such recommendations during the first three weeks that the stock of BluePoint was publicly traded. According to the Complaint, Armstrong praised BluePoint's investment value and encouraged investors who were experiencing trouble having their orders filled to keep trying. The Complaint further alleged that the promoters of BluePoint were secretly transferring stock in three other companies to Armstrong at prices below the then current market for those three stocks and that Armstrong made at least $20,000 by selling the shares he received from the promoters of BluePoint. The Complaint alleges that Armstrong did not disclose in his internet postings that he was being compensated for making the postings.
http://www.sec.gov/litigation/litreleases/2007/lr20228.htm
|
