SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Alighieri who wrote (956500)8/13/2016 6:25:12 PM
From: combjelly  Read Replies (1) of 1574683
 
You have to remember that Tim is an adherent of Austrian School economics. So he isn't bound by any semblance of reality. Because, theoretically, any tax cuts can be counterbalanced by equivalent spending cuts. So yes, you could cut taxes to zero by eliminating spending. Of course, you would have to shut down the government, but that would result in a massive increase in economic activity because the lack of regulations would cause an unprecedented economic boom.

Now those rooted in reality that the resulting chaos would have all kinds of repercussions. A booming economy would probably not be one of them. Because we all know what kind of economic powerhouses Somalia and Afghanistan are, right? They claim those examples are bogus because they weren't all that great economic power before they fell into chaos. But there are historical examples of economic powerhouses, like Rome, which did not boom when their governments collapsed. The fact that their decline as economic giants declined in pretty much lockstep with their governments should be a clue, but when reality conflicts with ideology, well guess what wins with those who aren't grounded in reality?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext