Been away for a bit and just catching up on the various posts. Just want to say that, although FC may have an agenda, and may very well be (insert various alias) under a new pseudonym, she does have a point that, if for no other reason, CUU may be a play for the seemingly random increases in share price that happen a few times every year.
I've thought of chancing a return to the company for that reason, but have opted instead for quick ins and outs week by week (and thank you Louel for that pearl of wisdom - it works wonders in my portfolio) in other companies.
Still, if I were to take FC at face value, she does make a valid point that there does seem to be a base around .12, and history does point to a double every so often, with an inevitable fall back down.
Of course, the counter point is also quite valid - she makes the point way too often, like a broken record.
For what it's worth, some of the quick 'ins and outs' have been in IVN, WEF, DNA, LAC and P, among others. More and more, however, I'm leaning to gold producers, and holding. |
