There's no doubt that Bill was a womanizer and adulterer par excellence ... that, I would say, is VERY common knowledge.
However, I wouldn't say that it is an effective weapon to use against Hilary.
Trump, in my opinion, should attack her on the lack of actual physical support and attendance that she's getting at her public meetings, compared to his own numbers, despite the so-called "evidence(?)" of the manufactured Polls.
He should also be attacking her on her collaboration, together with her husband, in the Clinton Foundation's reaping in of vast amounts of money, primarily for lining their own pockets.
He should be highlighting the fact that when she was appointed Secretary of State, she and her husband undertook to make clear and transparent ANY contribution made to their Foundation, ESPECIALLY if it came from another foreign government, because of how that could possibly harm the Obama administration. But due, I believe, to the massive Egos and Arrogance of those two Clintons, they haven't generally complied with that donor transparency ... no doubt for good reason.
In addition, Trump should also show her up for what she did while she was Sec. of State, where she used her governmental position to often clear the way for her husband's dealings with numerous very shady characters.
And then, of course, there are the emails and the server and the WikiLeaks founder, Julian Assange's, ongoing supply of information regarding Ms. Clinton's very shady past and abuse of her government office .....
That's where, IMO, Trump should be spending a fair amount of his public appearance in showing up Hilary for what she is, based on what she's done, AND to continue to ask the American public if that is the sort of individual that the American people would wish to have in the top office in the land ..... |
