SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Bonefish who wrote (966019)9/20/2016 7:23:20 PM
From: combjelly2 Recommendations

Recommended By
Land Shark
zax

  Read Replies (1) of 1575072
 
What part of the Clinton's didn't benefit don't you understand? Assuming there was payment for access, that is.

The fact of the matter is that Trump used his foundation to acquire items for himself and to pay off judgments against him or his companies. The benefit is pretty direct.

In the case of the Clinton's, no such direct benefit has been shown. They draw no salary from the foundation at all. The foundation doesn't buy them items, nor does it pay off judgments against them.So there is pay for a play to happen. And there has to be a pay for play for pay for access to even make sense.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News