SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 421.63-0.1%Jan 13 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Pogeu Mahone who wrote (122348)9/30/2016 5:02:48 PM
From: TobagoJack2 Recommendations

Recommended By
bart13
louel

  Read Replies (2) of 219333
 
it seems that any allegedly free, supposedly fair, and arguably transparent election system ought to be considered broken once the would-be electorates can be bought off w/ money siphoned from other could-be voters, more dollar equates to more votes, and dead people can vote

and once the system is broken, it could be that whatever the system throws up as candidates are automatically suspect, guilty until proven fine, just as would an industrial quality control system works

but if the candidates had never done a days of true work, and never governed any entity remotely akin to a population aggregate, then the merit of proof would be difficult to come by

and presumably the electorates must fall back on sound bites, smiles, and cheers, much as would a sporting event but one garnished w/ bread & circus

all complicated by the genuine smudges and true faults of the candidates that the system throws up

interesting experiment, albeit the time that may be lost, 4 to 8 years at a clip, may no longer be affordable

watch & brief
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext