Formerly About Applied Materials Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Applied Materials

AMAT 256.41

+1.1%

Dec 19 9:30 AM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: robbie who wrote (14054)	1/2/1998 11:43:00 AM
From: Proud_Infidel	Read Replies (2) of 70976

Robbie, My main point was that it was my belief that the K6 could not compete with the Pentium II since it was a 686 architecture while the Pentium II was a 786. How can a 686 compete with a 786? Shouldn't AMD be working on the K7 or K8 instead of undercutting prices on an antiquated(in computer life) chip? Does AMD really believe the computer buying population will not notice? Or am I missing something here? Brian

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next