SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : General market lab and commentary
SPY 683.41+0.2%4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Robohogs who wrote (590)10/28/2016 5:37:01 AM
From: Robohogs   of 668
 
538 on polls disagreeing. I had concluded in own mind they must be using highly different methodologies. If 538 analysis run correctly, results on edge of rare but near 95% band. Still probably something seen only 2-4% of time though - but given this odd election, maybe makes sense.

I am seeing very little evidence Trump is breaking through anywhere but toss-ups. He needs PA - highly unlikely per stats. Even if a 2000 happens and average misses by 3%, that only makes it nailbiting. My sense is Repub could win at Clinton + 2 given odd state dynamics. Likely? No. 538 odds look right to me. PEC too confident.

On Senate, it comes down to IN, PA, NH, NV, MO. I have a feeling IN may surprise but so may MO. If so GOP needs 2/3 of the rest to hold.

53eig.ht

Jon
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext