SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Cross Lake Minerals CRN

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: dean poets who wrote (1051)1/2/1998 9:37:00 PM
From: tanoose  Read Replies (1) of 3650
 
Hello dean;

I see what you are trying to do, but it is not like comparing apples with apples, to get a more reallistic potential comparison, one must look at the Kidd Creek deposit to get a more ture reflection of the potential.

It is known in the Timmins area for the actual mined grade to come out better than the drill results, just something I'am aware of, and I'am no expert at this. So I really can't explain it much better, this would be better explained by a geologist more familiar with this situation. On paper it is easy to draw up conclusions, but in reality it may differ greatly.

Manhattan is in Peru after all, and the geology although simillar, in many cases very different.

I do not own CRN, so don't take this as hyping, just an observation that was pointed out to me a few years ago when I was trying to do a comparison. Unless the geology is exactly the same (highly unlikely), the comparisons can be flawed.

With regards,Frank
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext