Hello dean;
I see what you are trying to do, but it is not like comparing apples with apples, to get a more reallistic potential comparison, one must look at the Kidd Creek deposit to get a more ture reflection of the potential.
It is known in the Timmins area for the actual mined grade to come out better than the drill results, just something I'am aware of, and I'am no expert at this. So I really can't explain it much better, this would be better explained by a geologist more familiar with this situation. On paper it is easy to draw up conclusions, but in reality it may differ greatly.
Manhattan is in Peru after all, and the geology although simillar, in many cases very different.
I do not own CRN, so don't take this as hyping, just an observation that was pointed out to me a few years ago when I was trying to do a comparison. Unless the geology is exactly the same (highly unlikely), the comparisons can be flawed.
With regards,Frank |