SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : View from the Center and Left

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Hayduke who wrote (317269)11/9/2016 6:49:04 AM
From: Sun Tzu  Read Replies (1) of 541044
 
Except that if you go back and read my posts, you see that everything worked out exactly as I spelled it out. I explicitly said that a vote for for Hillary is a vote for status quo and Sanders represents change...and Sanders would have the additional advantage of not being Hillary and therefore be more appealing to Hillary haters. Based on that alone, Sanders would have won. But there was more. At the time I pointed out that all Hillary supporters will support Sanders but the reverse is not true. And that there is no way that Hillary haters will vote for her but there is a chance that some of them may vote for another democratic candidate, given all the Trump flaws.

Tell me again what was the logic that Sanders was un-electable and how that would have worked out against Trump? What could have Sanders possibly said and done that would have been worse than things Trump said and did?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext