VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC) Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : VALENCE TECHNOLOGY (VLNC)

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: hcirteg who wrote (1863)	1/3/1998 2:04:00 PM
From: Paul Dubsky	Read Replies (1) of 27311

I will be holding my breath the entire time! Why would the results "break" VLNC if they're not positive? Although a first run through may not make it, couldn't they fine tune a process and make it work? Excuse me if I'm ignorant to the dry run vs wet run technicals, but for VLNC to come all this way and state 1st QTR production without a hint that such a process has not been completed and could be a disaster if not accomplished seems pretty far fetched to me. Of course, they promised batteries to MOT and HWP in 1993 without even knowing if they could accomplish it on the lines. They say you learn from your mistakes. I hope VLNC has learned. Do you have a position in VLNC? Would you be willing to give me your e-mail so that I can talk privately to you? Keep us up to date.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next