AAHHHH newborn's first post. I want to sent a special thanks to Richard, Dave and Andy for making a thread that lives and breathes new life from their commitment to help other by sharing their knowledge. I am sure there are plenty of other people who contribute to this thread, however these are the main gurus that I have seen from reading most of the post from the 1 - 900's. There is a wealth of knowledge here and you guys are outstanding!
Dave are you wanting to sell @ 2.5 x 180 day avg of vol because, this is a confirmation of a breakout and you will buy back after the stock pullback in price?
I want to contribute something to this thread by creating a response that links some of Dave, Andy and your work for easy access for new TAers.
I need to know how to place a link in a responds.
These links would be from your earlier works relating to indicators, TC2000 scans, and booklist to name a few.
I am wondering if this information is still good to use in this market. For example the posts up to around 900, which is may base of knowledge talks about TC2000 being the SW for newborn to learn. I peek around the 7000 range and found a post from either you or Dave saying that their TC2000 is inactivate. The reason is QP software is better now and data source is cheaper then TC2000.
I am on a trial offer of TC2000 and thinking ahead when the time is right to postion myself for using one of these WOW, MSWIN, or GET advance. Most of the scans here have been build for TC2000.
Questions:
Is QP or TC2000 better for now and at the next level?
Can you build Dave's DNS, TSV(10) with 13 ema, which is a TC2000 and StochRSI(14) in QP?
Has someone rewritten the custom TC2000 scans created in this thread for the QP SW?
Is the knowledge that has been accumalated on indicators MACD , OBV with a 40 ema, RSI(10), RSI(13), RSI(20,9) STOCH(7,3,10) up to the 900 post still validate?
Should I continue to read the posts from the 900's or is my time better spend in the 7000's being more current?
OK, question overload. I should have respond sooner instead of bombarding you with all these questions. You guys have sparked a lot of thoughts within me and I have lots of desire to learn.
Thanks Tom |
