SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Value Investing

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: bruwin who wrote (58549)11/24/2016 4:00:03 PM
From: Spekulatius2 Recommendations

Recommended By
E_K_S
Jurgis Bekepuris

  Read Replies (2) of 78813
 
Re Assets - I disagree on the following statement
The Value of those Assets, and here I refer primarily to Fixed, don't really benefit a shareholder until such time as a company is liquidated, or those Assets are producing a Revenue.
Same could be said about BRK various assets. BRK does not pay a dividend, so unless there is a liquidation, what benefit does holding BRK stock to a shareholder?

I own several asset rich companies. in some cases, theasset does not contribute to the income line, but the value is sill there. QUCT is an extreme example - they own a huge swath of ranch land in CA, that is worth a lot, but does not generate really any income. However, as long as QUCT does not fritter away the value of the land, the value will be there in the future as well. THe stock trades a huge discount to NAV and I don't necessarily expect this to close. I expect QUCT to at least appreciate at the same rate the assets and earnings (from the trust business grow ) do,and I am fine with that. If the discount to NAV would close, they would be a great windfall, but I don't necessarily expect this to happen.

Another example is MAYS , which own very valueanle RE in Brooklyn, which is leased below prevailing market rates. Hedge funds went in and expect management to redevelop or monetize some properties, as these leases expire, but that did not happen, Management continues to do what they have been doing for years and rent them out - the discounts to MAYS NAV does not close and now these hedge funds are selling.

I the end, this is all about managing assets. The liquidation endgame is hypothetical. A company like GOOG (which does not pay a dividend either manages their search business as an asset and tires to make it more valueanle, by growing earnings. A RE company tries to increase the value of their RE holdings, wether that is reflected in the income statement is a different matter. Malone is very good at manageing assets in the media business, while avoiding to pay taxes, as many times, his company don't show GAAP profits.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext