SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Liberalism: Do You Agree We've Had Enough of It?

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
FJB
Investor Clouseau
TideGlider
tonto
Woody_Nickels
To: Kenneth E. Phillipps who wrote (195544)12/1/2016 9:28:44 AM
From: weatherguru5 Recommendations   of 224750
 
It's not much different now than it was 75 years ago. Again, cycles. If there's any factor that does correlate with global temperatures, it's the vertical component of the intensity of the geomagnetic field of Earth (inversely correlated). The weakening north & south magnetic poles help formulate the story. CO2 has very little to do with it. If scientists could get off the CO2 horse, some real research & science could be done.



From the chart above, the most rapid increase in global CO2 occurred from 1940-1980. During this time, the Arctic cooled. That significant chunk of time is ignored by the "great" scientists, while they collude to change the observations.



Fast forward nearly 40 years.



And remember, I focus on the poles, since CO2 only absorbs infrared radiation in the band of 12-17 micrometers, which occurs at subzero temperatures. All other places on Earth is a radiative window to CO2 (but not H2O).
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext