SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Income Taxes and Record Keeping ( tax )

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Peter Singleton who wrote (380)1/4/1998 11:06:00 AM
From: Colin Cody  Read Replies (3) of 5810
 
Peter, IMO your method is OK to a point. One thing an agent SHOULD do is trace to the source of funds used to BUY that particular security, and if THOSE funds were margin loans, he SHOULD then RECLASS that amount from investment debt to personal debt IMO. If he did I think you may still be able to agrue the point a bit, but it would be better to just be more careful up front.
.
Such as only withdrawing THE PROFIT from a sale. That way the cost portion would revert back to repaying the original borrowings.
.
You might start always withdrawing all PROFITS on the settlement day, and transferring to personal funds. Yes you margin balance will be higher, but you might stand up better in audit. An agent might also look at this ploy and ask how you'll ever make up "losses" in you always withdraw each profit.
.
When you have more than adequate personal funds available, you might make margin debt repayments from there...
.
Colin
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext