Mike,
I believe I asked you a question first, but I'll respond first, in good faith that you'll respond to my question of your impressions on Webers' post to you from PRTI.
A: I can't think of one! In saying that though, I actually think the halt was beneficial to RMIL because of some of the concerns addressed in Mikes' PRTI post to you, furthermore, historically, and I just had a conversation about this with a buddy Jason of mine , who is a supervisor of brokers in a large firm in Chicago.....there has never been a squeeze of this magnitude of a OTC BB stock , accelerated by demanding certs, his feelings are , it has the potential to be the greatest squeeze ever, if the co. can come thru with the fundamentals that we've discussed here, new bottling facilities, new contracts for the clothing end, etc.
So, in summary, I agree with you that halt=lowered price, but RMIL is a unique interest.
Now, can you respond to Webers' post from PRTI
Pugs |
