SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy of Death, Disease, Depravit

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: Brumar8912/12/2016 9:34:46 PM
   of 1308
 
Massachusetts churches get huge win in Religious Liberty case

Dec. 12, 2016 3:30 pm by The Right Scoop

I see this as a battle that shouldn't even have to have been fought.

Four pastors in Massachusetts have scored a big victory by getting the Attorney General to back down on a ridiculous interpretation that churches were were places of public accommodation. This would have forced churches to allow transgeders to use whatever bathroom they chose in order to comply with new state law banning discrimination against gender identity.

But the lawsuit from the pastors forced the AG to discard the new interpretation and churches, at least for now, are safe.

CBN NEWS – Four pastors in Massachusetts are dropping their lawsuit against the state after the attorney general’s office revised the interpretation of a new gender identity anti-discrimination law which categorized churches as places of public accommodation.

The state’s move protects the First Amendment rights of Massachusetts churches to express their beliefs about gender and sexuality and operate their bathrooms in a manner consistent with their theology.

Classifying churches as places of public accommodation is virtually unprecedented and potentially opens them up to variety of anti-discrimination laws that could clash with their beliefs.

The trouble for churches came Sept. 1st, when the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination issued a “Gender Identity Guidance” that said churches could be considered as places of public accommodation under certain conditions. “A church could be seen as place of public accommodation if it holds a secular event, such as a spaghetti supper, that is open to the general public,” said the commission.

The guidance says that an individual’s gender identity can be identified “by an evidence that the gender identity is sincerely held as a part of the person’s core identity.”

The attorney general’s office also issued a “Gender Identity Guidance for Public Accommodations” and said that “houses of worship” are places of public accommodation.

Now, the attorney general’s office says that its revision to the guidance removes the “categorical reference to ‘houses of worship’ as an example of a ‘place of public accommodation.'”

This won’t be the last time states try to turn private churches into public places simply so they can force this gender identity crap down our throats. Pretty soon churches won’t even be able to preach against homosexuality and its ugly transgender step-sister. This is the slippery slope we are on and it’s just a matter of time before we hit the bottom, whatever it looks like.

http://therightscoop.com/victory-massachusetts-churches-get-huge-win-religious-liberty-case/
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext