SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 414.48+0.7%Jan 9 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (126188)12/14/2016 2:50:48 PM
From: bart13  Read Replies (1) of 219172
 
Bart the various theories are irrelevant

So you agree that AGW and related are not a science, since it's predictions suck and have consistently been wrong?

Although I agree about balances, I'm very far from certain that we know all the things that need to be balanced, let alone that we know all the factors. And hell, we just found out recently about a large chain of underwater volcanoes in the Eastern Pacific too. In other words, AGW believing climate "scientists" are arrogant enough to believe that we know it all about the planet and its elements and processes

To the best of my knowledge, soot itself is also a major factor in warming but it appears nowhere in the models.

I also do have strong beliefs and desires about cleaning up pollution, just to make sure that's clear.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News