"<<If aipn is successful, you stand to make good money; but if things go sour, you will crow about how you told us so. You talk like a fatalist who believes aipn is destined for the junk pile.>>"
Ken, You are not alone. That's exactly how Greg's posts came across me when I read them. This guy is the biggest "FRAUD" I've seen in years. What surprised me the most was the fact that he's got the nerve to challenge anyone to point out his inconsistencies. If his three posts below "(day(s) interval)" are not inconsistent I don't know what will.
Yes, he is all over the place. This guy probably didn't realize that from the closing price of 3 7/16 on Dec 30 to @5.00 will result in a 45% increase in price. Isn't this something we can consider dramatic?
a) December 30, he's saying that the stock could go down to 2s
b) Dec 31, a day later, he says the stock is not going anywhere
c) Jan 03, two days later, he was saying it may go up to 5.
Dec 30, 1997
"<<Of course it is interesting that the stock is doing exactly what I stated it would do. This stock is on its knees holding out a tin cup and begging for a handout. If your worried about the 3s, maybe you should just wait to vent when it starts dwelling in the 2s--what
is to stop it? News? Oil is sliding down; demand isn't as high seasonally as expected; interest in aipn is drifting away.>>"
Dec 31, 1997
"<<My view, however, is unchanged. The stock isn't going anywhere until aipn can show us the oil. I'm still betting they will be able to do exactly that in the future. Future=months, not days.
January may be an auwfully quiet month.>>"
Jan 3, 1998
"<<Stock should gain some momentum and struggle for the 5s, but it won't be sustainable. There will be nothing sustainable until either a JV or oil is proven.>>" |
