2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 366.54

+1.2%

Nov 5 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (126290)	12/16/2016 8:44:17 AM
From: bart13	Read Replies (2) of 217544

Bart, you are getting into a very complex and not really defined question. Related to your remark of "soot coming from many sources including diesel exhaust" there are many other factors that definitively do not reflect the solar irradiation back into space. Which is my point - if it's not a defined question, then it's just yet another item that's not part of the global warming area that's being ignored by the "science is settled" cronies. And of course the area is complex... and very poorly studied IMO. My point is very simple and I tend to look at the facts. The ice caps and the glaciers, they are melting and sea levels are rising.This is sufficient to order less soot to be inserted in the atmosphere. --- Which means less coal and hydrocarbons burning. Would that this is the first time that glaciers are melting and sea levels are rising, and most of the others are before the current global warming times. Farms in Greenland are but one example.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next