re <<The Chinese regime abhors openness. See the effect of being swamped by openness:
How comes the US president elect uses social media to go about state business and here in China things happen behind the doors and are communicated to us, population, after the deals are done?>>
yeup, so many other regimes love openness and displayed much such, especially recently, and shall be affected going forward, for 4-8 years, and then again
management by social media, tweet storm, what an idea that is bad, made worse by person who cannot read, do not have time to check spelling, and is unpopular w/ 50% of the population, declining by the tweet
you are i am guessing in favour of 50 changes of regimes in 50 years?
i am not in favour of 1 change of regime every 50 years.
i like 1 change every 10 years.
let us see how open tweet is a good idea, once it is proven
am guessing that, at times of imperatives, true leaders must be given the safe-space to deliberate, else ... well ... india used to be open, until folks woke up one otherwise fine day and found all their money left via broad daylight open but sudden open governmental act
long term planning, announcements, staging, implementation etc is an alternative to tweeting and sudden implementation of big moves discussed only amongst 4 'leaders' in a nation of 1+ billion, elected or not
watch and brief |
