SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Gold/Mining/Energy : Strictly: Drilling and oil-field services

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: jim p. holcomb who wrote (6525)1/4/1998 6:01:00 PM
From: Thean  Read Replies (1) of 95453
 
Jim, regarding GW,

If the stock performs as predicted and if it only performs at 1/2 of the predictions of Jeffries & Co. , and assume their 1998's earning is $0.14 and 1999's earning is $0.24, then GW's high will be $7 for 1998, IMO.

If the estimates are 0.27 and 0.48 however, GW's PE should be in line with its peers, namely NBR, PTEN, UTI, BDI. Therefore, I would look at this group and see where they trade in the future and compare GW to them. The old high, $10, is attainable only if we go back to the irrational exuberant mode a few months ago. GW's PE will still be a whopping 10/0.27 = 37 in 1998. I would seriously considering selling when the land driller PE's approach 30 in 1998. Therefore, my best guess for GW in 1998 is it will continue to be trader's stock with big (30%) swings from up and down in many short cycles. I intend to trade GW and not hold it long term.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext