2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 368.29

+0.6%

Nov 7 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: dvdw© who wrote (126853)	12/22/2016 9:08:51 AM
From: bart13	Read Replies (1) of 217573

Doubt that anything within the scope of the network and application described, has relative value to networks using these systems for millions of years. I'm only talking about current and future human military, corporate or political uses. If the entanglement is destroyed just by a hacking attempt, actual communication and the certainty of it being valid is destroyed per your "Particles in quantum entanglement share a quantum state that will collapse upon observation. This means that legitimate users of the quantum communications system will notice if they've been hacked, from the quantum state collapsing due to another party viewing the transmission." There is a limit to the utility of screwing the pooch as your single goal. Those wanting hegemony over information, those with something to hide, won't do well against the reality of the network of the quantum field, where everyone knows everything about everyone else as a system default. Lost me here. If "everyone knows everything", the value of supposed secure quantum communications becomes zero...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next