SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 442.03-2.6%4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Snowshoe who wrote (127364)12/30/2016 8:48:33 AM
From: elmatador  Read Replies (1) of 220055
 
No equilibrium neither "the winner takes it all"

There always be less artificial disequilibrium. Globalization was supposed to be the leveler but we had the historic repressed urbanization in China. That is translated to TJ as winner taking it all...

The lack of equilibrium reflects:
  • Culture: Muslims are less equipped to get ahead.

  • Resources: as desert areas lack materials and arable land.

  • Language: barriers to compete

  • Useless governments
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2026 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News