SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Apple Inc.
AAPL 277.81+0.7%3:53 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Doren who wrote (7158)1/4/1998 10:04:00 PM
From: FR1  Read Replies (3) of 213173
 
The reason I think a Apple takeover would be good for IBM is that they can make a move to establish the dominant OS for all computers. They failed in the past (OS2, etc.) because they did not have any "seeded sites". There was no "mass of millions" installed and absolutely no reason to dump Win95 and take OS2.

Apple allows IBM the rare opportunity to deploy a OS that is guarenteed to have a following of millions and is fundamentally better than NT. With the right muscle and sales, it has a serious possibility at replacing Microsoft. Rhapsody also fits beautifully with their database products. The only thing they need is a good word processor and they have a complete contender to Microsoft - the office package + the OS. This opportiunity may not come again. On top of all this is the fact that all the fat is out of Apple and they should start making a profit soon.

One other thing - IBM is not dumb. Let's not forget that IBM stock dropped 50% in the not too distant past and stayed there for some time. They have made a financial comeback by reorganizing and getting some fat mainframe contracts. But reorganization is over now and with parallel processing + faster chips comming on the market, the fat is going to be taken out of the mainframe sales. IBM needs to think and act different too - otherwise they will go back to where they were a few years ago.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext