The Trump Presidency Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : The Trump Presidency

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

TimF

To: Lane3 who wrote (4705)	1/4/2017 6:01:28 PM
From: mel221	1 Recommendation Read Replies (1) of 356267

>> And you have chosen to label that as person? But what is your basis for the label? Process of elimination. What else could it be? The union of a human egg and a human sperm produces a human being. Not a kitty kat nor a puppy dog. Pretty simple really. >> I am not suggesting it has no moral standing at all, but where does it gets the rights of a person, particularly rights that supersede those of the woman carrying it? Technology will certainly complicate this. Consider the following; Test Tube conception and an artificial womb. The Embryo develops into a fetus and the fetus develops to the point to where today's incubator can support the fetus. So, the fetus is never born as it is never removed by C-Section or travels through a birth canal. When was that person born? When did it become a human being? So, when should a person developed without a woman's body be pronounced "A human being"? Artificial wombs: The coming era of motherless births? geneticliteracyproject.org

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next