SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Northwest Biotherapeutics Inc.
NWBO 0.240+3.4%Oct 30 3:58 PM EDT

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
From: John McCarthy1/10/2017 12:16:27 AM
   of 759
 
H2R Sunday, 01/01/17 01:01:48 PM
Re: marzan post# 92797
Post # of 94293

Meta Analysis: A Simple Graph

Here is one reason I think the mPFS will be better than 4 months. Based on below, I'm thinking 7 months stat sig. at the very least
And remember: the original study was aiming for 6 months!
And mPFS is the primary endpoint.
And mPFS is not affected / confounded by a cross over trial.

Flipper found the reference of the meta-analysis of DC studies over 409 patients (21 studies in all I believe, not sure):
journals.plos.org

For my part, I believe that DC Vax-L will perform at least as well as those. Anyways, on the PFS, here is one heck of a quote:

" Our meta-analysis showed that DC immunotherapy benefits the PFS, which could be up to 50% at the 1.5-year mark. "

i.e. mPFS should be around 18 months for the Tx population.

Using section 3.3 and some linear interpolation (given the shape of the curves, good enough for me), I put together the following:

* a summary of the PFS numbers for the aggregate:


* Interpolation:
mPFS 8.8 months for Placebos (cannot be a year with 67 % PFS events at the one year mark!)
mPFS 19.2 months for DC!!
That's an over 10 months diff between Placebo and Tx!

* the corresponding graph


Here is the abstract of the meta-analysis:

Abstract

Background

The effectiveness of immunotherapy for high-grade glioma (HGG) patients remains controversial. To evaluate the therapeutic efficacy of dendritic cells (DCs) alone in the treatment of HGG, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis in terms of patient survival with relevant published clinical studies.

Materials and methods


A total of 409 patients, including historical cohorts, nonrandomized and randomized controls with HGG, were selected for the meta-analysis.

Results

The treatment of HGG with DCs was associated with a significantly improved one-year survival (OS) (p<0.001) and 1.5-, 2-, 3-, 4-, and 5-year OS (p<0.001) compared with the non-DC group. A meta-analysis of the patient outcome data revealed that DC immunotherapy has a significant influence on progression-free survival (PFS) in HGG patients, who showed significantly improved 1-,1.5-, 2-, 3- and 4-year PFS (p<0.001). The analysis of Karnofsky performance status (KPS) demonstrated no favorable results for DC cell therapy arm (p?=?0.23).The percentages of CD3+CD8+ and CD3+CD4+ T cells and CD16+ lymphocyte subset were not significantly increased in the DC group compared with the baseline levels observed before treatment (p>0.05), whereas CD56+ lymphocyte subset were significantly increased after DC treatment (p?=?0.0001). Furthermore, the levels of IFN-? in the peripheral blood of HGG patients, which reflect the immune function of the patients, were significantly increased after DC immunotherapy (p<0.001).

Conclusions

Thus, our meta-analysis showed that DC immunotherapy markedly prolongs survival rates and progression-free time, enhances immune function, and improves the efficacy of the treatment of HGG patients.

siliconinvestor.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext