SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Taro who wrote (994347)1/16/2017 5:38:51 PM
From: mel2211 Recommendation

Recommended By
Mick Mørmøny

  Read Replies (3) of 1571691
 
>> I don't think life accompanied the Big Bang but rather developed millions of years later.

The earth was formed in part from Star guts after some star went super nova some 9 Billion years after the big bang. It appears life started about 700 hundred million years after the earth was created.

>> how did life develop itself next?

Not known today. Its a hard problem with a few partial theories kicking around.

>> So far nobody has been able to duplicate that process

This is true. The condition of the early earth are difficult to fully conceive and duplicate.

>> So much has been tried and so many have been working on it to get some kind of life stepping out of the dead molecule soup.

Not really. The funding for Origins of Life research is pitiful compared to Aids or cancer research. How about the Large Hadron Collider? The funding for that project was $13.25B as of 2012. Can you site an Origins of Life project of that scale? I am not aware of anything close.

ibtimes.com

I suspect that the laws of nature (physics, chemistry, energy, etc) will make the formation of bacterial life inevitable in ideal conditions. Discovering these ideal conditions will be a formidable challenge.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext