Don't Ask Rambi Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Don't Ask Rambi

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: epicure who wrote (5734)	1/5/1998 1:52:00 PM
From: Lady Lurksalot	Read Replies (1) of 71178

Ah, but Alexa, when the barkeeps refuse to serve to minors the police are right there to assist with enforement! No such police help is available under this new law. In other words, the law lacks the teeth of police power. It is a Health and Safety Code law. It may be a Labor Code Law. The law goes nowhere near the Penal Code. The barkeep is the ONLY policeman. And again, it is the business owner who will be punished--NOT the smoker! With reference to independent contractors having the right to refuse to work in your home, all well and good. But what about the subcontractors? After all, the contractor must provide a safe, smoke-free workplace for the employees. No? Believe me! There were oodles and scads of restaurants up SF way which did not permit smoking anywhere within their four walls. There were two right here in tiny ol' Benicia! Holly

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next