SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
Investor Clouseau
PKRBKR
POKERSAM
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (997841)2/1/2017 7:22:19 PM
From: Thomas A Watson3 Recommendations  Read Replies (2) of 1575175
 
ratie your science ignorance is not quantifiable. The catastrophic effect babbled about is science pornography. No one denies that CO2 is a sligtly polarized molecule that will absorb a very small band of photons. However the amount that will be absorbed in an atmosphere with often hundreds of H20 molecules for every CO2 and that absorbs 100 times the energy per molecule.

For CO2 to have the catastrophic effect babbled about the hot spot had to occur. It did not and thus CO2, or and increase of 1 more part in 10,000 does absorb or increase the amount of energy absorbed to have the proffered heating effect.

That is what my previous post demonstrates and does not in any way contradict anything in the bla bla you posted.

ratie you cannot deny science because you have no concept of what science is. All you got is political science pornography.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News