SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: one_less who wrote (9478)2/3/2017 6:37:09 PM
From: Lane3  Read Replies (2) of 354270
 
This is my understanding of Will's point.

Justice Antonin Scalia once wrote, "If you want aspirations, you can read the Declaration of Independence," but "there is no such philosophizing in our Constitution," which is "a practical and pragmatic charter of government."
The proposition is that all persons are created equal in their possession of natural rights, to "secure" which — the Declaration's word — the government is instituted.
Will's point is that the philosophy in the Declaration is subsumed by/incorporated into the Constitution. Scalia didn't see it that way. He hopes that Gorsuch differs from Scalia in this regard.

The rest of the piece is the point I was making to Tim on this thread not too long ago. It was about "life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness and natural rights and the 9th Amendment meaning that we have Constitutional rights beyond those explicitly stated in the Constitution whether the majority approves or not.

The drama of American democracy derives from the tension between the natural rights of the individual and the constructed right of the community to make such laws as the majority desires. Natural rights are affirmed by the Declaration; majority rule, circumscribed and modulated, is constructed by the Constitution and a properly engaged judiciary is duty-bound to declare majority acts invalid when they abridge natural rights.
So it's Congress's job to write laws to please the majority and the Judiciary's job to make sure that the majority isn't trampling on the natural rights each of us has as claimed in the Declaration in addition to the stated Constitutional rights. To me this is the essence of what this country is about.

Will said it better. More succinctly, at least, than I did in that colloquy around the first of the year.

It's satisfying to discover that George Will agrees with me. <g>
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext