SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : The Trump Presidency

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: i-node who wrote (9594)2/5/2017 11:33:24 AM
From: Wharf Rat  Read Replies (1) of 354317
 
The whistle is blown on a serial climate liar...again.

David Rose's alternative reality in the Daily Mail
You can see this "pause" in the graph below of the global mean temperature. Can you find it? Well you have to think those last two years away and then start the period exactly in that large temperature peak you see in 1998. It is not actually a thing, it is a consequence of cherry picking a period to get a politically convenient answer (for David Rose's pay masters).



variable-variability.blogspot.com

Much Ado about a NOAA Thing

The ever-reliable science denial vector – Daily Mail has come out with another set of accusations about NOAA temperatures.
I guess they didn’t realize that those findings have already been confirmed in a well vetted Journal


climatecrocks.com






Expose: David Rose does not understand baselines
Posted on February 5, 2017 by ...and Then There's Physics
Never failing to disappoint, David Rose is back with a new expose on how world leaders were duped into investing billions over manipulated global warming data. It refers to a paper published by Karl et al. in 2015 in which they suggested that there were [p]ossible artifacts of data biases in the recent global surface warming hiatus. David Rose has, however, found a whistleblower who has come forward to highlight how the data in this paper was manipulated. This whistleblower is a recently retired NOAA employee who apparently has an impeccable reputation. Of coure, David Rose appears not to have consulted any others who might also have impeccable reputations. Also, to suggest that this one paper was the primary influence in recent decisions about global warming is utterly bizarre, especially as this paper didn’t really change our basic understanding at all.

andthentheresphysics.wordpress.com
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext