SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics for Pros- moderated
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: LindyBill who wrote (624910)2/9/2017 3:26:43 AM
From: Maurice Winn  Read Replies (1) of 793896
 
There's never an argument which doesn't need legions of lawyers. As long as the money keeps coming, there are more arguments and bits and pieces to argue and higher courts to appeal to.

The Supreme Court will need to weigh in to show how they are the most important of the powers that be and not to be trifled with when it comes to what's constitutional and what's not.

The argument that banning Moslems is a religious test is absurd as the basis for the test is the belief in jihad and therefore conquest of the USA and compulsory conversion of the population to Islam or dhimmitude or worse and the imposition of sharia law in place of constitutional law. Even if it was a religious test, the right to immigrate is not subject to a religious test.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News