SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
FJB
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1000884)2/19/2017 11:16:02 AM
From: POKERSAM1 Recommendation  Read Replies (3) of 1575797
 
Even if your chart is correct, which I doubt, how do you know the temperatures rising is related to an increase in CO2 levels. The fact you have a chart showing both increased over time does not mean the two are related.
Most people who develop cancer have flown on an airplane. A chart can be produced showing that over time air travel and the occurrence of cancer have increased. So can we assume that air travel is a cause of cancer?
I don't think so.
We could also "prove" that eating strawberries out of season in New England is a cause of cancer in New Englanders. Both of these things have increased in the 20th Century. Are the two related?
I don't think so.

Yet you say, "Condition X is pre-industrial CO2, and A is the temperature. Condition Y is current CO2, and A has changed." So what have you proved? Sorry, but you have proved nothing yet.

Let us use air travel and cancer rate. "Condition X is pre 20th Century air travel, and A is the cancer rate.
Condition Y is the current air travel and A has changed". So can we assume that air travel is a cause of cancer?

I have dumbed this down in hopes you can understand it.
You are really not very bright are you?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext