Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy of Death, Disease, Depravit Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Margaret Sanger's Eugenic Legacy of Death, Disease, Depravit

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

From: Brumar89	3/1/2017 7:27:17 PM
	of 1308

Study Says Babies Start Learning Language In The Womb Posted at 8:00 pm on February 28, 2017 by Kira Davis The New York Times recently published a fascinating article on the science of language in the womb and how babies learn and absorb the spoken word. New research is teasing out more of the profoundly miraculous process of language learning in babies. And it turns out that even more is going on prenatally than previously suspected. By looking at international adoptees — babies who were adopted soon after birth and who grow up hearing a different language than what they heard in the womb — researchers can see how what babies hear before and soon after birth affects how they perceive sounds, giving new meaning to the idea of a “birth language.” Experts have known for some time that newborns prefer to listen to voices speaking the language that they’ve been listening to in the womb, said Anne Cutler, a psycholinguist who is a professor at the Marcs Institute for Brain, Behaviour As the debate about abortion and right-to-life rages on, it is important to note that science and research increasingly point to a baby in the womb being unquestionably deserving of the term “life”. Babies in the womb observably exhibit every feature needed to qualify an entity as “alive”. From the division of cells to the development of a beating heart to the ability to feel pain and discern language and vocal patterns there is little room for doubt about when life begins. If one does not wish to concede that life begins at the first division of the first cell, at the very least we can be certain it begins many months before birth. The abortion question is no longer a question of when life starts. Science speaks loudly on this issue, learning new things like that of the Dutch study on a regular basis. It is important that those fighting for the right to life for pre-born infants understand we are no longer arguing on those biological terms anymore. The fight can only and should only be framed now as wether or not it is morally acceptable for a society to approve of ending the life of a baby for any reason. Perhaps the question shouldn’t always be asked so bluntly, but it is important to ask abortion advocates if there is any circumstance under which a baby deserves to die. We should not be afraid to force the pro-abortion lobby to answer “yes” to that question and own their position, because science is no longer able to provide them cover. For an excellent and more in-depth analysis of this study and what it means to the issue of life I highly recommend Albert Mohler’s Daily briefing from 2/27/17. albertmohler.com

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next