RE <<Every production that move out for Vietnam or Myanmar increases the GDP of these countries while lowering China's>>
yes, i can see how china is in fierce competition w/ ... vietnam and myanmar ... to sell t-shirts and market plastic flowers, that is why china needs so much iron ore from banana republics in s. america
and
i can see how china would one day be importing industrial robots from brazil and sourcing steel from india
but i won't, because i cannot twist my head over the math of such a world
Re <<Had not be for the artificial growth like keep boosting heavy industry, building artificial islands or defense spending it would have been already in the natural 4%>>
you are right, china doesn't need to upgrade heavy industry because there are natural and ready suppliers of what heavy industrial production china requires to build out a continent and network / link three, with the capability, capacity and inclination - i just cannot name such a country off hand ... my mind draws a blank, as in zilch, zero, nought, goose egg, nada
Re <<4% today is more than 10% 20 years ago>>
i do resonate w/ this statement, as add to it, that 4 years today is more than 10 years 20 years ago |
