2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 368.18

-0.5%

Oct 31 5:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

Recommended by:

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (131329)	3/6/2017 10:04:24 AM
From: Horgad	6 Recommendations Read Replies (2) of 217501

As usual you are not taking an impartial view and are distorting the facts. The question was asked and answered in context of the Trump campaign. There is not a chance any court would be able to convict him of perjury. Is it possible that he intentionally avoided talking about activities not related to the Trump Campaign using the same tactic as Bill's famous "I did not have sex with that woman."? Maybe, but even that I am not convinced of after seeing the exact context and reply and hearing Session's explanation of his answer. I am no fan of Trump or his appointees, but to me this smells like a witch hunt...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next