SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Politics of Energy
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Eric who wrote (75227)3/7/2017 9:33:00 AM
From: Brumar891 Recommendation

Recommended By
teevee

  Read Replies (2) of 86355
 
The "saturation point" is anywhere on the Henry's Law line. You're claiming atmospheric CO2 rises can force more CO2 into the ocean even though the ocean is warming .... the exact opposite of what Henry's Law says. Because you think there is some magic saturation point that is unrelated to water temperature.



Henry's Law
http://www.800mainstreet.com/9/0009-006-henry.html

Warming oceans would hold less CO2.

Ice cores show atmospheric CO2 has followed temperatures up and down. Warmer periods had more atmospheric CO2. Scientific studies of trees preserved at the La Brea tar pits show that trees were starved for carbon during the last ice age. This is all consistent with Henry's Law. As the earth cools during ice ages, the oceans absorb more CO2 taking it out of the atmosphere. As the earth warms during interglacials, the oceans give up CO2 to the atmosphere.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News