Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1005476)	3/11/2017 1:48:27 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) of 1575632

I just read the articles you referenced. There was no "science" in any of them. They were opinions. There was no direct link between fires and global warming. These was the supposition that 1°C would suck so much moisture out of the tree it would make it vastly more likely to burn. It is a perfect example of the garbage science you and other Warmist nutjobs are relying on. Suspect this, suspect that, but it isn't science. If you want to know the facts, you do a damned experiment. You control the temperature in one place and not in the other. They you see how easily they burn. Or whatever. You can't just say, "A warmer climate also leads to earlier snowmelt, which causes soils to be drier for longer. And dry soils become more susceptible to fire. "The areas where wildfires are taking place are always areas that [have become] drier and hotter, and where spring has come earlier," said Funk. Drier conditions and higher temperatures increase not only the likelihood of a wildfire to occur, but also the duration and the severity of the wildfire." This is not science. It is creative writing.

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next