2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 378.35

+2.7%

Nov 10 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Haim R. Branisteanu who wrote (131997)	3/16/2017 5:33:09 PM
From: John Vosilla	Read Replies (1) of 217656

Is ironic places like Manhattan were quite affordable as recently as 35 years ago yet had everything you describe and much much more prior to technology explosion and fed ZIRP policies. The choice to me isn't really just a NYC vs small towns. Mid sized towns 250k-1M most of which I have been to have a lot going for them these days. Other now larger 2M+ fast growing metro's like Austin, Raleigh, Orlando and SLC becoming expensive now as well but of course look cheap compared to NYC.. Seems from all I read most who aren't already rich and need to make a living but don't have stock options in a Facebook or Goldman Sachs do dislike living in SF or NYC and can't wait to one day leave whether is the dream house in the exhurbs or moving to FL, AZ, TX or NC

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next