SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 368.29+0.6%Nov 7 4:00 PM EST

 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: TobagoJack who wrote (132207)3/16/2017 8:51:06 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Read Replies (2) of 217573
 
TJ, despite all of your ranting and raving and spouting the party line of the Chinese Gov't (which wishes to promote the idea of "sex slavery" in Korea in order to divide the two nations), all you can do is speculate about their conditions..

I've provided you an AUTHENTIC interrogation report from 1944 reflecting the conditions and status of 20 Korean women who worked as "comfort women" in Burma.. BURMA.. literally one of the HELL HOLES of WWII combat.

When a prostitute has to explain how they found themselves in such a despicable occupation, do you REALLY believe they want to say that they volunteered and actually signed a contract?

No.. it's much easier to say that they were forced to be sex slaves..

But then they have a hard time explaining why they were actually PAID to provide their services (by the soldiers) or why they split that payment with the "house master", or were able to buy clothes, perfume, and food items that were not rationed. Nor can they explain why the Japanese commander ordered that they be permitted to return to their homes upon fulfillment of their contract and debt.

It's ALL there... these were specifically KOREAN women, and there is no reason to believe that they were, somehow, a special case and all of the other 190,980 alleged Korean "comfort women" were actually "sex slaves"..

If the allegation is that this was systemic "sex slavery" (without pay, and the women kidnapped), then why were these 20 Korean women treated so differently than the others?

Do I claim that there were no cases of sex slavery? NO. But the evidence is that they DO NOT reflect the overall manner in which sexual "services" were provided to Japanese soldiers.

Simply put, they had NO NEED to kidnap women... There were plenty of poverty stricken families in Korea who were willing to "push" their daughters into such service. You, as an Asian, should understand this.. It STILL HAPPENS, especially in China where the one child policy has created a major shortage of women for men to screw. That is why China is one of the major countries involved in sex trafficking.

exordio.com

thediplomat.com

You have Chinese (and other countries as well) "sex tourists" traveling to places like Cambodia, where poverty stricken families force their children into prostitution..

edition.cnn.com

Poor Thai families do it too...

articles.latimes.com

Perhaps it was for those very reasons you favored traveling to Koh Samui so often?

Me.. I just went for the foot massages and the diving in Koh Tao.. (and I did date a very nice young Thai woman on Samui).. But then I was single at the time.

Hawk
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext