SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
To: Wharf Rat who wrote (1007284)3/22/2017 2:20:37 PM
From: i-node  Read Replies (1) of 1575981
 
They say (in the article):

"There is no question that increased levels of greenhouse gases must cause the Earth to warm in response."

How do we know the above is a true statement? You cannot infer it to be true from the claim that the Earth is warming. We know there are some physical events that can mitigate the warming.

Are they saying this is "settled science" because they THINK it "must case the Earth to warm"? Precisely how did they prove this to be true that it makes the Earth warmer?

Now, you may think I'm just being confrontational here. But I seriously don't understand on what basis this conclusion is being drawn. Is there REAL proof of it? Or is someone making a giant leap that there SHOULD be warming, there IS warming, hence Co2 caused it?
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News