SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum
GLD 383.15+0.8%4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
louel
To: TobagoJack who wrote (132434)3/22/2017 5:52:11 PM
From: Maurice Winn1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 218037
 
Boars are delicious. << attack dogs can be engaged by nastier counter-attack dogs and boars>> That might not be a good thing for Mexico to supply, free. Quite an industry could develop for cheap roast boar.
Asterix and Obelix would love it.

Per your and China's idea of shooting in the back people crossing the Tibet border in the snow, do you think a bounty for snipers shooting invaders would do the job? Maybe you are on to something. Or better still, the invaders could be captured and sold at auction as organ donors. It would not take long for invaders to get the message.

The attack on the USA you described would falter rapidly in the face of such defences.

As per videos from USA military aircraft in Iraq and elsewhere, people on the ground up to no good can be completely unaware of being observed from the sky and they realize there's a problem only when thousands of bullets arrive in a few seconds from the sky. Such aircraft could patrol the southern border and any attacks on the wall be dealt with quickly. The boars and dogs would wonder what the heck happened. So would the wire-shorting and cutting and wall-scaling invaders.

It would probably be more economic for little drones to fly the line, with teeny tiny guns on board for up close and personal incapacitation of invaders. They could fire tiny "tranquilizer" guns of varying chemical formulation depending on the situation/invader. A "wasp sting" would be sufficient to dissuade most people. But sarin might be needed for some.

DARPA must be loving the opportunity.

Mqurice
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News