| | | Don’t cry for Chelsea Clinton
By
Howie Carr
-
March 27, 2017
505
Meet America’s newest victim – Chelsea Clinton.
-- story continues below --
Nobody knows the troubles she’s seen. Chelsea’s got a right to sing the blues.
This week, in the Los Angeles Times, someone named Ann Friedman laid out the former First Spawn’s credentials as a modern Democrat in good standing. Chelsea is oppressed, as opposed to, say, another first daughter with blonde hair.
“Chelsea,” Friedman wrote, “like her mother, never gets a break – unlike Ivanka and her father.”
You don’t say. Now that I think about it, it really must be arduous being Chelsea Clinton. This LA Times op-ed appeared a day after it was reported that after a nationwide search, she’d been added to the board of Expedia, a travel company owned by Clinton-connected billionaire greedhead Barry Diller.
The pay: $250,000 a year in stock options, plus $45,000 cash. It’s her second no-heavy-lifting director’s gig at a Diller company – she also grabs $299,936 a year for sitting on the board of something called IAC Interactive. Nice work if you can get it.
Chelsea Clinton. How did her father’s aide, Doug Band, describe her?
“A spoiled little brat.” In the Wikileaks emails, Band said she had dipped into Clinton Foundation funds for “her V.I.P. wedding,” which he described as “not smart.”
But then, how could a graduate of such lofty institutions as Stanford, Oxford and Columbia possibly concern herself about such mundane matters as the provenance of money.
“I was curious,” she was once quoted as saying, “if I could care about (money) on some fundamental level, and I couldn’t.”
What exactly are Chelsea’s credentials? She’s in the Guinness Book of World Records, or should be, as the world’s highest-paid intern. She made $600,000 a year “working” for NBC News alongside anchor-fraud Brian Williams. Somebody did the math on her on-air packages (put together by a producer, of course) and discovered that she was paid $26,724 for every minute she appeared on NBC.
Chelsea Clinton was born on third base and thinks she hit a triple – can I actually say that about a member of a protected class (Democrats) and not be brought up on hate-speech charges? Of course, when the exact same thing was said, and rightly so, of George W. or Jeb! Bush, it was marvelously droll and speaking truth to power.
This Ann Friedman can’t understand why the spawn of Hillary and (perhaps) Bill is so resented for winning the lucky-sperm contest.
“The laser-focused Chelsea vitriol is perplexing when it comes from the left,” writes Friedman, who is easily perplexed. “Shouldn’t such first-daughter hatred be reserved for Ivanka?”
Like Ivanka Trump has had it easy, being screamed at on a Jet Blue flight to West Palm by an unhinged homosexual in front of her three babies. Or having her clothing line purged from dying department-store chains on grounds of insufficient Political Correctness.
Chelsea, on the other hand, gets a total free pass. She starts tweeting, and her family’s media rumpswabs swoon. The fake-news Washington Post says her tweets are “edgy.” Politico describes them as “spicy, sassy.” CNN agrees – Chelsea’s tweets display “sass.”
But then, CNN is the Clinton News Network. They employ an operative, Jake Tapper, who used to work as a hack Congressional aide for Chelsea’s mother-in-law, ex-Rep. Marjorie Margolies Mevzinsky.
Chelsea’s father-in-law, Edward Mezvinsky, was also a Congressman, before he went to Club Fed for stealing $10 million. He did five years under the Bureau of Prisons number #550404-066.
Actually, that’s something Chelsea has in common with the evil Ivanka, who deserves to be hated, according to the LA Times. Ivanka’s father-in-law did a federal stretch too. Charles Kushener’s 14 months in the slammer is required to be mentioned in all stories about Ivanka in the fake-news media.
But reminding readers of the depredations of Chelsea’s father-in-law – it’s not a hate crime exactly, but it will certainly get you shunned in polite circles, like ABC “News,” where George Stephanopoulos, one of her parents’ obsequious former coatholders, now makes $13 million a year to push the alt-left agenda. Donald Trump’s aides, on the other hand, are accused of being Russian, rather than Clinton, agents, on less evidence.
But Chelsea is sassy, not to mention, above it all. She only makes $65,000 per speaking engagement. Her Gramercy Park apartment in Manhattan cost a mere $10.5 million. Her net worth, at age 37, is but $15 million.
No wonder she can’t care about money on some fundamental level.
Chelsea Clinton. She just can’t get a break. |
|
