2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 399.01

+0.1%

Dec 19 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: Elroy Jetson who wrote (132665)	3/29/2017 3:53:11 PM
From: louel	Read Replies (1) of 218614

He's doing nuclear and we're not doing anything That part is true Russia & China are steadily spending as much as they can on their military. The US has actually pulled back spending over the last 8 years. That is not good in an adversarial atmosphere. A lot of this conflict where we must stay at odds with other nations. Has an ulterior motive. Actual agenda hidden to maintain public support. Wars in poor and over populated countries make money for those supplying the arms. It creates jobs and is a vital part of the economies. Lots of this adversarial conduct is just front for the real underlying reason. If they curtailed arm sales what would it do to employment numbers ? I'm sure you can see that. Always look beneath the surface. 2) It is a form of population control. Just as the suddenly appearing scourges like Ebola ,Aids and many others... They just didn't happen out of thin air after centuries of being absent before new science technology was developed. Did you ever notice how they start in over populated underprivileged countries ? Coincidence ? NOT ! Just that AIDS got away on them and came home. Only took a few years do find a controlling agent when it did. The drug is cheap, But is it readily supplied in abundance to the poorer over populated countries ? Of course not. To do so would defeat the purpose of the original intent. It is easy to get caught up in believing what Media and politicians peddle, Seriously asking why the agenda is promoted most times sheds a whole new light on the thinking. The old saying "Believe nothing what you hear and only half of what you actually can see. And question it all before accepting it. You are smart enough to do so

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next