SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Zenyatta Free Speech Board
ZEN 77.480.0%Nov 21 4:00 PM EST
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  
Recommended by:
hoperrs
To: NuclearCrystals who wrote (16195)4/5/2017 10:37:23 AM
From: the Chief1 Recommendation  Read Replies (1) of 22811
 
Where they take their chances is if the suit is considered to be mischievous or frivolous. Because if the suit is seen as having no value in law, then there is a case for CCB too go after the same people for commercial interference as you say.
They assume that they are fighting for what they see as right. Which is fine, but if there is absolutely no merit to the case then they could be in a whole hurt of trouble afterwards.
So, if I understand the lawsuit Mudslide and friends are suggesting that Mayor Council GSLR, MRC etc broke the law. If what they did in actual fact was adhere to Quebec law, then the case will be thrown out of court and thats where I think they will have an issue. So they wanna have a lawyer that knows what the options were for the signees before they go to far.
As far as I can see, none of them had any choice Grandfathering is there for a reason. Ponder a Park or a Rec area without checking to see if there is existing claims already on the property you are contemplating may have been an error on their part but, under Quebec law, all they could have done was Ponder. Perhaps MRC noted after the ponder that there were sub surface claims and rather admit they made an error decided to let the whole matter slide. No matter what, the decisions had nothing to do what RMC or GSLR may have wanted but more so what was the Law.
Report TOU ViolationShare This Post
 Public ReplyPrvt ReplyMark as Last ReadFilePrevious 10Next 10PreviousNext  

HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News