2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum Message Board

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : 2026 TeoTwawKi ... 2032 Darkest Interregnum

GLD 385.99

+1.6%

Nov 12 4:00 PM EST

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next

To: TobagoJack who wrote (133078)	4/13/2017 9:57:26 AM
From: bart13	Read Replies (1) of 217739

imo, should china really had to resolve (pardon, i meant re accommodate) the kim issue, china would do on own, invite kim to beijing, and keep him there but that would set a bad precedent Beats hell out of any other option on the table, and neither the UN nor United has put anything on the table. in the mean time usa seems to believe it has the capability / capacity to re accommodate kim, so we best leave it to trump to try first Who knows? Trump offered first crack and China more or less turned it down. Both sure have the capacity and capabilities. Reminds me of Obozo's red line and a recent Syria event. A bunch of Tomahawks could be effective at that one base that seems to be be close to test/launch mode. Does the UN have any cojones for enforcement or are they just a paper tiger for their decades long pointing & noisy worrying? And the Dems are seemingly in war/kill/mo' money loving mode suddenly on Trump. Will Trump take the bait for more uber hate?... stay tuned for more exciting adventures on the continuing saga of kingergarten "humanity"...

Report TOU Violation

Share This Post

Public Reply Prvt Reply Mark as Last Read File

Previous 10 Next 10 Previous Next